Delhi’s Rohini Court heard the Goa nightclub fire case on Wednesday and observed that the applicant was not physically present within its jurisdiction and questioned how the petition for anticipatory bail could be considered maintainable in such circumstances. In response, Advocate Tanveer Ahmad Mir for Luthra brothers cited legal precedents to address the court’s query. He submitted that he was moving the application because the applicant is a permanent resident within the jurisdiction of the court.
